Credit: Equinor
Will the new brand be valuable?
The change from the legacy name Statoil to Equinor caused a stir. Was the rebrand worth it? Will the new brand be as valuable and build on its legacy? The Brand Project analyzed the brand valuation post rebrand, and made recommendations for future growth.

Equinor ASA is a Norwegian multinational energy company with more than 21000 employees in more than 30 countries.

  • Intelligence and analysis
  • Recommendations for future growth and focus

A rebrand causing a stir

In 2017, Statoil made the strategic decision to become a broad energy company investing up to 20 percent of annual capital expenditure in new energy solutions. Naturally, they needed to consider a complete rebrand to reflect the new ambition.

By May 2018, they officially changed their 46-year-old name from Statoil to Equinor. The change had the press up in arms and drove public opinion, particularly in Norway. The strategic reason for the change of Equinor raised concerns and disbelief amongst the general public, and most failed to see the long-term effect and positioning plan of the company. Listening to only the Norwegian media you might believe that Equinor was not sincere in its approach to renewable energy sources, as well as having “thrown away” billions of dollars in actual brand value by changing its name.

Is it worth it?

In early 2019, Equinor enlisted The Brand Project to review the change, define the value lost or gained, and simplify the findings from the Brand Finance valuation report, as well as make recommendations for future growth.

Empirical and quantitative research based on Equinor´s 2018 brand and business management showed that Equinor did not only retain its position as the most valuable brand in Norway, it even increased its overall brand value and cemented its place in the global top 200.

There was a slight decrease from 2018 to 2019 when Isolating brand strength alone, which is 1 of 3 factors in determining the overall brand value and is the most conclusive driver for brand management work. When benchmarked against major global players like Shell, Exxon, Total, Chevron, Aker BP and Ørsted, Equinor came out at the top in brand strength alone.

The solution

Based on this insight, it was concluded that the rebranding effort was a measurable, clear success for Equinor. If anything, it only marginally decreased their brand strength globally (which was to be expected after a complete rebrand), and has not harmed their position, or their quantitatively-measured perception.

The Brand Project recommended 4 defined actions to define local perceptions and positions, strengthen and prove the aspired position of the sustainable energy company and continue to aggressively market the sustainable ambitions of the Equinor brand globally.

Now let's talk about you! Get in touch. Combined Shape

Want to learn more about this project? Reach out to

Haley Zerwas

Up next
Combined Shape
Combined Shape
See more work Combined Shape

When customers, employees, and stakeholders love your brand, you fuel growth and create a platform for long-term success.

Read more about our expertise Combined Shape